Interview: Zaki Ibrahim Talks Every Opposite

There’s something about Canadian-born South African singer/songwriter Zaki Ibrahim that resists rigid classification; a refusal to be inhibited by the world. Her recent acclaimed LP, Every Opposite, is “plural in its reach”, fingering an encyclopaedia of influences from hip-hop to indie to soul. The result is an incredibly captivating record and the timbre of Zaki’s voice is spellbinding. We caught up with her to talk about life, influences and her first full length release.

Okayafrica: Your identity, much like your music, is mesmerizingly elastic. You've got roots on both sides of the Atlantic (Canada and South Africa). Tell us a bit about your upbringing and how you see your place in the world.

Zaki Ibrahim: I wouldn’t call my identity elastic, but rather diverse. There is no stretching or bouncing but rather finding ways to fit it all into the rest of the world, in bits and pieces. It is all that I am made of and I am a product of all of it.  As I’m growing up, as most people do, I feel like I’m becoming increasingly more comfortable in my skin. I feel less and less alien in the places I live and more a global citizen.

I was born and raised free, thanks to my parents who came from worlds that were less than that. I was encouraged to remain free and promote the concept in every sense of the term. I hope to challenge and celebrate this “gift” in my music wherever I can.

Zaki Ibrahim - The Do (2012) from Christian Denslow on Vimeo.

OKA: When did your life in music begin and who were some of your early influences?

Zaki: My early influences were my older cousins and brothers and sisters who were into their stuff like house music, hip hop, kwaito, pop, Prince, Sheila E, Anita Baker and so on. My father pushed hip-hop on me like it was a tool that would later save my life. He also played Pink Floyd, Jimmy Hendricks, Tom Waits and Carol King at full tilt on the regular. I suppose the music that was enjoyed around me, influenced what I would later be drawn to, so basically most music.

The political, Pan-African mentality that was instilled throughout my up-bringing, provided content for the ever justice seeking and freedom fighting themes in my songs and with my mother being a poetic soul and grammar fanatic, I have always tried to steer clear of being too literal or forceful with my views so I often choose love songs to say it all.

OKA: How has the journey been so far?

Zaki: Awesome. Organic. Exciting. Challenging. Demanding. Rewarding…

OKA: You and Tumi Molekane (from Tumi and the Volume) go way back; tell us a bit about your working relationship at Motif records.

Zaki: Tumi and I met before I called myself an artist. I worked at a radio station and interviewed him in Cape Town with his band. I later toured with the band (Tumi and the Volume) with a collective called District Six Music in Canada, three times. I also opened some of the shows and sang back up for them and K’naan. At some point I needed to give in to the idea of being a musician and put out my first EP independently. Tumi has always been the friend whose musical taste I respected. We’ve shared concepts and lyrics and since then, been sounding boards for each other. Putting out my first full length album with Motif seemed like a good fit.

OKA: Every Opposite is an incredible album; tell us about the process of putting it together, how long it took, and what you were going for?

Zaki: Thank you! LOL…hmmm…once it was organized and collected into one studio, it only took about 3 months to properly compile. The two years prior to that, I was on a quest to gather the sound I needed to at least loosely tell the story I needed to tell.  There were two states of creativity, one, like a novelist, purely writing in silence and finding the words to illustrate my message, and two, an experimental work-shopping of sounds. I suppose letting the overall sound naturally come together given the diversity in my path. At times scientist and at other points I fancied myself a magician. Tiago, Catalist, Wawesh, LV, Rich Kidd and Nick Holder all helped me produce my first full length record as if they had been there throughout my entire development as a musician and with such patience, encouragement and pride, it made the process feel entirely “home made.”

OKA: Lastly, what’s next for Zaki Ibrahim?

Zaki: I’ve only really released Every Opposite in South Africa so far (and digitally on Bandcamp), so I’m sure there is a ton of groundwork to cover in preparation for the Europe and North American releases, (which will both be different editions to the original SA record). I hope that the various editions are able to be collector’s items. With full vinyl presses and a few beautifully illustrated singles on 45s. Even after completing and releasing the initial album, it seems to be taking on a life of its own. I look forward to seeing what happens and how it’s received internationally. I’ve been away from home for a few months now and Cape Town is calling me. I plan to breathe its air and snuggle in its warmth at least for a few weeks before heading out to Europe again then braving the North American market. I try to write and record most days that I’m not performing, so, if all flows free as it should, there are many more releases, collabs and projects I look forward to sharing as I go.

OKA: Congratulations on Every Opposite and we wish you all the best with your next projects.

Zaki: Thank you




Today Marks the 58th Anniversary of the Assassination of the DRC's Patrice Lumumba

Patrice Lumumba was the first Prime Minister of the Democratic Republic of Congo following its independence.

Today the DRC celebrates Heroes Day and honors its first democratically elected Prime Minister Patrice Lumumba. Lumumba came into power after what was then the Republic of the Congo received its independence from its colonizer, Belgium. Whilst speculation and conspiracy still surrounds his assassination in 1961 till this day, it has long been alleged that he was murdered by the US working together with Belgium.

Keep reading... Show less
News Brief

Prominent Zimbabwean Activist Sheds Light on Current Crisis

Doug Coltart, a vocal activist and human rights lawyer based in Harare, speaks to Okayafrica about what's currently happening in Zimbabwe.

A few days ago, the Zimbabwean government issued a directive to major cellular network providers Econet and TelOne to disable the internet and all access to social media. The directive was an attempt to prevent any information from spreading outside the country's borders with regards to the nationwide protests which have led to the deaths of at least five people and the injury of at least twenty-five others.

Keep reading... Show less
The front page of The New York Times on January 16, 2019

Kenyans Are Furious at the New York Times for Posting Photos of Terrorist Victims

After the the deadly attack on Tuesday, many are accusing the American newspaper of having a double standard on which dead bodies they allow into the paper

Is the New York Times guilty of a double standard when it comes to publishing images of dead bodies?

Kenyans, and others fed up with the coverage, took to social media in the hundreds to denounce a Times article that included an image of victims of Tuesday's Nairobi terrorist attack, bloodied from bullets, and lying hunched over their laptops, dead.

It has cause enough debate online to where the Times' incoming East Africa Bureau chief Kimiko de Freytas-Tamura felt the need to explain their photo policy, which is to show the dead only if their faces cannot be seen in the image. The photo in question fits the policy as the faces are facing away from the camera. She would later apologize before posting the official policy to her Twitter account. The photo remains up.

The Times' official response, as those tend to do online, has only created more anger. But unlike many unruly Twitter mobs, those responding to the official statement have a rather coherent message—"you wouldn't do this with photos of the American dead."

Some of the responses to the Times' official statement.

In a response to the controversy from the Poynter Institute, a typically astute observer of journalistic practice in the United States, they run through the typical American journalism school approach to publishing photos that might shock or offend. They write:

Should the Times have run the photo?
There is no easy answer.
The first question any news organization must ask when deciding to publish violent images is: WHY show it?
In other words, what is the news value? Does the public need to see such an image to fully grasp what happened? Does the public need to see such a photo to confirm or disprove the official account of the events?
An argument could be made that a writer's words could accurately describe the scene without being as disturbing as the image. In addition, when it comes to an act of terrorism, might publishing such a photo actually advance the cause of the terrorists, showing the damage they caused, thus fueling dread and panic?
Also this: The photo on the Times website came without warning. As a reader, you didn't know you were going to see a photo of dead people until you actually saw it.
Those are arguments to not run such a photo or, at least, warn readers of its graphic content.

While it's a fine analysis of when to show a violent image, it misses the central issue at play for those aggrieved by the Times' posting—that the American news-gaze values certain lives differently. Black, brown, foreign, poor—American journalism organizations, including the New York Times, cannot escape a base ethnocentrism in their coverage. It's so embedded into how these institutions operate, and the gap in understanding is so wide, that to much of the world, the Times' official response is laughably wrong at first glance.

"We take the same approach wherever in the world something like this happens--balancing the need for sensitivity and respect with our mission of showing the reality of these events"

And while there are examples from the Times that complicate this feeling, like these images of the dead in the terrorist attack in Nice, France, it doesn't discount the wider and correct feeling that the white victims of American mass shootings are treated differently than their African counterparts. And while there are complicated and systematic reasons for this which will always make discussing it difficult, to simply deny that different standards exist, does not increase the Times' credibility with Kenyans or the newspaper's growing online audience which will only become more vocal about how they're portrayed.

get okayafrica in your inbox